← Back to Save Arlington Gymnastics

Why This Page Exists

We believe transparency matters. Below you’ll find the official communications Arlington County has sent to gymnastics families, and public discussions of the proposed cuts — presented unedited so you can read them for yourself and draw your own conclusions.

What This Email Left Out

We present the email above unedited. Below is our analysis of what it says — and what it doesn’t.

Who was notified

Recreational and adaptive families received nothing

This email was sent only to families registered for competitive gymnastics. If your child takes recreational classes or parent-tot classes at Barcroft, you likely never received this notification — even though your program is being eliminated too. Families of children in adaptive gymnastics programs for kids with disabilities were also not notified.

What’s missing

Adaptive programs are not mentioned once

The words “adaptive,” “therapeutic,” and “disability” do not appear anywhere in this email. Barcroft hosts one of the only publicly accessible adaptive athletics programs for children with disabilities in Arlington County. Those families were neither mentioned nor notified. The county’s own email erases them from the conversation entirely.

Alternatives claim

“Non-County alternatives” — but which ones?

The email states:

“Arlington is fortunate to be part of a region that offers many non-County alternatives.”

Private gymnastics programs in the region cost 2–3x what county programs charge. For families who depend on affordable public programming, “go elsewhere” is not an answer. For adaptive families, there is no comparable alternative — the county did not name one because none exists in Arlington.

Timing

Friday afternoon, less than 24 hours before the budget release

This email was sent at 2:34 PM on a Friday. The full budget was released Saturday morning. Barcroft staff received severance offers that same day, with less than 45 days to decide. Families had less than 24 hours to absorb the news before the proposal went public. This is notification, not engagement.

Transparency

No details on what Barcroft becomes

The email says the facility will be repurposed for “other operational needs” but provides no specifics. A 28,000 sq ft purpose-built athletics center — funded by taxpayers — will be closed for at least a year, and the public has been given no information about what replaces it. We have filed a Virginia FOIA request to find out.

Accountability

The Board directed the budget targets — not this specific cut

The email states the County Board “directed the Manager to prepare a balanced budget.” The Board set deficit-reduction targets. The County Manager chose to propose eliminating gymnastics and closing Barcroft. This means the Board can still reverse this specific cut without contradicting their own budget guidance — they just need to hear from you.

County Manager’s Budget Message — Key Findings

We read the 65-page FY 2027 Manager’s Message so you don’t have to. Here’s what it reveals about gymnastics and Barcroft. Read the full document →

The framing

County Manager calls gymnastics “nice to have”

On page 2 of the Manager’s Message, County Manager Mark Schwartz explicitly categorizes gymnastics programs as services that are:

“…nice to have, but not necessary to provide core services”

He then claims these services “continue to be available in our community through private providers.” This framing reduces a 30-year public program serving hundreds of children — including children with disabilities — to a luxury the county can simply outsource to the private market.

The math

Less than one-tenth of one percent of the budget

Closing Barcroft and eliminating all gymnastics programs saves $969,542. The total county budget is $1.69 billion. That means the county is eliminating all competitive, recreational, and adaptive gymnastics to save 0.057% of the budget — roughly 6 cents for every $100 spent.

For context, the average Arlington homeowner is already paying a $444/year tax increase in this budget. The gymnastics savings amount to approximately $4.50 per Arlington household per year.

No plan

Barcroft will be closed for a year — before they know what to do with it

The budget document states:

“The Barcroft Center will be closed for a year while staff determine the condition of the facility and assess what work will be needed to reopen the building to provide increased and more diverse programming.”

Read that carefully: they are proposing to close a 28,000 sq ft purpose-built athletics center, lay off the staff, and end all programs before they have a plan for what comes next. The “operational needs” cited in the DPR email above? They don’t exist yet.

The jobs

22.75 positions eliminated — 19.75 currently filled by real people

The Barcroft closure eliminates 13.0 filled permanent positions, 3.0 vacant permanent positions, and 6.75 filled temporary positions. These are coaches, program coordinators, and facility staff — many of whom have served Arlington families for years. Staff received severance offers the day before the budget was made public.

The debt

Barcroft is part of a $150 million line of credit

The Manager’s Message reveals that Barcroft’s debt is part of a $150 million county line of credit used to finance multiple facilities. The county allocated $5 million in FY 2026 to pay down Barcroft’s floating-rate debt — then deferred that payment. Closing Barcroft doesn’t eliminate the debt; it just means taxpayers pay it for a building that sits empty.

Missing data

No enrollment numbers, no cost recovery data, no alternatives

The 65-page budget document provides detailed participation data for after-school programs (1,028 participants), youth initiatives, and behavioral health services. For gymnastics? Zero. No enrollment numbers, no waitlist data, no cost recovery calculations, and no analysis of alternatives like fee increases, public-private partnerships, or phased reductions. The county is asking the Board to eliminate a program without providing the data to evaluate it.

Adaptive erased — again

The word “adaptive” does not appear in the DPR section

Just like the DPR email, the Manager’s Budget Message makes no mention of adaptive or therapeutic gymnastics in its discussion of the Barcroft closure. The DPR section describes the facility offering “classes, recreational and competitive gymnastics, and a fitness center” — but does not acknowledge the adaptive programming that serves children with disabilities. A program that doesn’t exist on paper is easy to cut.

County Board Budget Meeting — February 21, 2026

~7-hour meeting where the proposed elimination of gymnastics and closure of Barcroft was publicly discussed for the first time.

On February 21, 2026, County Manager Mark Schwartz presented the FY 2027 Proposed Budget to the Arlington County Board. The meeting lasted approximately 7 hours and covered a $37 million budget gap across a $1.7 billion county budget. Below are the key moments related to gymnastics programs and Barcroft Sports & Fitness Center, with timestamps linked directly to the video.

5:56:01 Mark Schwartz County Manager

County Manager proposes eliminating gymnastics and closing Barcroft

As part of $10.6 million in service and program reductions, the County Manager formally proposes discontinuing the gymnastics program at Barcroft. The cuts affect 56 FTE positions, of which 24 are currently filled.

“I’m also proposing that we stop the gymnastics program that we have at Barcroft. I know that’s already gotten a lot of attention in the community and I welcome the conversation about the value that that program adds and whether there are alternatives in lieu of that.”
Why this matters

The County Manager himself says he “welcomes the conversation” and acknowledges there may be “alternatives.” This is not the language of a final decision — it’s an invitation for the community to push back.

6:24:06 Matt de Ferranti Board Chair

Board Chair acknowledges massive community response and requests alternatives

Chair de Ferranti addresses the gymnastics program directly, noting the Board has already received significant community input. He explicitly asks for alternative options over the remaining six-week budget process.

“We have already heard significantly about the gymnastics program… I would like that option to be available to us over the course of the next 6 weeks. I’m not trying to prejudge that.”
Why this matters

The Board Chair says he is not prejudging the decision and explicitly wants as many options as possible. This confirms the Board has not made up its mind. Your emails, your testimony, your presence at Open Door Mondays — it all matters.

6:24:06 Matt de Ferranti Board Chair

Chair reveals fee analysis shows “extremely extremely high” costs to self-fund

In the same remarks, Chair de Ferranti discloses that the county has already analyzed what it would cost to make the gymnastics program fully fee-supported — and the numbers are prohibitive.

“We are also prepared for that question about what it would take to make that program fully fee supported. I found when we had that conversation internally that the level of fees were extremely extremely high and I’ll just leave it at that, but I don’t want people to take that out of context because they deserve to see the numbers and weigh the information.”
Why this matters

This is a critical admission. The county’s own internal analysis shows that making gymnastics self-funding through fees alone would price families out. This undercuts DPR’s suggestion that “non-County alternatives” (private gyms) are a viable replacement — if the county itself can’t make it work at market rates, how can families be expected to afford private programs? The community deserves to see those numbers.

6:26:41 J.D. Spain Sr. Board Member

Board Member Spain commits to “due diligence” on gymnastics

Board Member Spain names gymnastics explicitly as a major area of community concern and commits the Board to thoroughly reviewing the proposal.

“We have already received enormous amounts of communication from the community about their concerns, whether it’s gymnastics, whether it’s libraries… and we’re going to do our due diligence.”
Why this matters

Your voices are being heard. Board Member Spain places gymnastics alongside the library cuts as the two highest-profile concerns. He commits to due diligence — which means the Board needs to hear specific, actionable alternatives from the community, not just opposition.

6:34:17 Takis Karantonis Board Member

Board Member Karantonis acknowledges the human cost

Board Member Karantonis addresses the impact on the 24 filled positions affected by the proposed cuts, including Barcroft staff who received severance offers the day before.

“There is no more painful decision when we start thinking about the 56 FTEs, 24 of which are filled, and there are real people with real lives, and we fully understand how this affects them, and that cannot be overstated.”
6:09:00 Emily Hughes County Financial Official

Barcroft carries floating-rate debt — county deferred $5M paydown

During the financial overview, county staff revealed that the Board had previously allocated $5 million to pay down Barcroft’s debt in FY 2026, but that payment was deferred due to economic uncertainty. Each $1 million in debt buydown saves roughly $100,000 in annual debt service.

Why this matters

Barcroft carries significant ongoing debt. The county deferred paying it down — and is now proposing to close the facility. The community deserves to know: is the closure driven by program performance, or by the facility’s debt burden? These are different problems with different solutions.

Notable absences

What was not discussed at the meeting

Despite the gymnastics cuts being one of the most prominent budget proposals, several critical topics were never raised during the 7-hour meeting:

• No specific cost data for the gymnastics program was presented
• No participation or enrollment numbers were shared publicly
• No mention of adaptive or therapeutic gymnastics programs
• No formal statement from the DPR Director on the gymnastics proposal
• No analysis of cost recovery or the operational model
• No presentation of alternative options to full elimination
• No comparison to other jurisdictions’ public gymnastics programs
Why this matters

A 7-hour budget meeting discussed a $37 million gap in granular detail — but the Board received no data, no alternatives analysis, and no program-specific briefing on the gymnastics cuts. How can the Board make an informed decision without this information? We have filed Virginia FOIA requests to obtain it.