Board Scenario Planner

"How Do We Get to Yes"
FOIA C-7656
Interactive
Cost
Recovery
Fees &
Rates
Capacity
Revenue
Streams
Acct &
Overhead
Presets
DPR Today
Moderate
Market
Full Recovery
Cost Recovery Pyramid — drag programs between tiers
Rec / Adaptive Fee
Fee per class (now $13.80)
Rec Market Position (per class)
Competitive Rate
Base $/hr (now ~$8.02)
Volume discount (20+ hrs/wk)
Non-resident surcharge (now 15%)
Competitive Market Position (20 hr/wk annual)
Competitive Fee Impact (sample)
Add Capacity
Additional rec sections
Avg students/section (now 8)
Fill Vacant Positions
Context: 1 position is the program manager (DPR leadership considers essential to operations). 2 are rec lead instructors needed to expand classes, birthday parties, and open gym — the same programming SAG advocates for. Freezing these positions improves budget numbers but limits the program's ability to grow. Question: Can we advocate for more capacity while also freezing the hires needed to deliver it?
Team & Rec Manager → Rec Classes
Team managers and the rec manager allocate a percentage of their hours to teaching rec classes. Comp coaches already do this — this models managers doing the same to add rec capacity without new hires. This is a common model at other gyms and creates a more resilient team design by ensuring backup coaches are always available.
% of manager hours to rec classes
Grow Competitive Program
Additional comp athletes
Program peaked at 202 athletes (2020) vs 154 today. Growth through waitlist conversion, Xcel track expansion, and restored community confidence. Added athletes need marginal temp coaching (~1 coach per 20 athletes). Res/NR mix held at current 76%/24%.
Workforce
Reintroduce Classes
Programs (AAPA/ATPA Proposals)
Facility Rentals (Off-Peak)
Fixed-Estimate Programs
DPR Cost Reconciliation
DPR Slide 15 shows $2,291,040 total expense and $1,321,498 revenue = $969,542 net. Our FOIA-based cost build totals higher. DPR never provided a line-item breakdown reconciling slides 20 & 23 to slide 15.
Slide 15 (3/5/26): Expense $2.29M − Revenue $1.32M = $970K. Our comp cost build ($1.17M from FOIA salaries) exceeds DPR's slide 20 ($985K) by $189K; facility+mgmt allocations account for the rest. This toggle subtracts the unexplained difference so the model starts at DPR's presented number.
Excluded Revenue (Accounting Corrections)
Est. annual Enjoy revenue
FOIA C-7656-0112: "Enjoy classes in other spaces such as the wellness room and boxing studio are also not factored into the revenue reduction." C-7656-0050 (DPR staff): 462 enrollment slots, 377 enrolled Winter '26, 37 waitlisted — dance, martial arts, fitness, wellness in rooms separate from gym.
GWU Revenue
FOIA C-7656-0077: GWU practice M–F 7am–10:30am, $275/practice, $88K/yr. C-7656-0112: "Revenues generated from GWU Gymnastics… are not included in the reduction."
Context: GWU offered equipment to the gym program, but county policy prohibits accepting used equipment due to lack of warranty and safety concerns. Question: Does this limit the partnership's upside beyond rental revenue?
Rate adjustment (1.0× = current $88K)
Context: A coach reported Navy interest, but Alex asked the coach to have Navy contact DPR directly — unclear if they followed up. Much of this was discussed over Teams/phone (not captured in FOIA). Question: How firm was this offer?
Overhead Allocation
An activity-based allocation better reflects actual administrative workload. Rec serves 1,866 students vs. 148 comp athletes — over 12× the registrations, billing transactions, and parent communications. An 80/20 split aligns overhead to the volume of administrative work each program actually drives, rather than an arbitrary 50/50 split.
Rec share of mgmt overhead
50/50
80/20 txn vol
Management FTE
3 FTE Current (~$255K)
2 FTE Moderate (~$170K)
1.5 FTE AAPA proposal (~$127K)
Vacant Instructor Positions
3 instructor positions budgeted but not hired — $73.3K median salary × 1.41 fringe × 3 = $310K phantom cost removed
DPR Overhead Rate
Overhead % (DPR standard: 13%)
Revenue: DPR Baseline vs. Your Scenario
Costs: DPR Baseline vs. Your Scenario
Incremental Revenue + Savings by Lever
Cost Recovery by Program
DPR Slides 15, 20, 23 (3/5/26) · FOIA C-7656 (159 docs) · GWU: C-7656-0071/0077/0108 · Enjoy Classes: C-7656-0050/0112 · Comp: C-7656-0042/0046 · Recovery: C-7656-0128 · Revenue ideas: AAPA/ATPA Feb 2026